Saving the Planet one meal at a time

I am not one who believes that if we all do out little bit – for example, walk to the local shops not drive or cycle to work every Friday – there will be an appreciable effect on mankind’s greenhouse gas emissions, and hence an affect on the climate. BBC’s Ethical Man did all he could for a year to cut his emissions:

We did all the big stuff. We stopped flying, got rid of the car and changed the way we heat and power our home.

But we only managed to cut our carbon emissions by 20%. That’s right, just 20%.

Remember, according to the scientists we need to cut our emissions by 80% by 2050 just to keep climate change within two degrees centigrade of current world temperatures.

Clearly even the best efforts of ethical men and women on their own will not be enough to prevent global warming.

There are a lot of confounding factors that make this going solo tactic very difficult. If the aim is to avoid major climate change that there are of course Free Riders to worry about. Those that will carry on polluting regardless of your good deeds, they will reap the benefits of the affect – if any – of your actions but bare none of the cost.

Moreover, as illustrate by Ethical Man, the Western world has a deeply carbon intense lifestyle. Your best efforts to change your lifestyle within the limits of acceptably behaviour will only just make a dent in your carbon emissions.

There are habits which need to be lost. Jim Jepps recently asked how we can reduce traffic with a view to reducing emissions and improving our roads. He favours the carrot over the stick but I feel without increasing the cost of driving – to accurately reflect the real cost of driving – habits will be slow to change.

However, putting these to the back of your mind there are positives to the small steps which we can all take.

For example someone on the Moral High Ground is usually fairly poor company at a party, but when campaigning or debating holding onto the little things can help defend you from attack and strengthen your own arguments.

Although the individual and cumulative effect of your actions will be comparably slight to non-existence, taking small steps will help keep you focussed, when dealing with something so vast and chaotic as the environment it can be difficult to see the link from an individual actions to their affect on the system as a whole.

So if I don’t think the real world effects of a more sustainable lifestyle are particularly important why write this post?

Well, I’ve just cooked a fantastic curry. And instead of using three chicken breasts I used one and added potatoes to bulk it out.

In one year a square meter of your garden can produce around 1600 calories of Potato, if you wanted to use that square meter to grow the food to raise a chicken, each year you could produce 190 calories of chicken, if you haven’t worked it out that wouldn’t fill a service station sandwich.

The same can be said of other vital inputs like water. To produce one kilo of Potatoes requires 50 Gallons of water. This sounds relatively thirsty until you compare it with Chicken for which you would need 1600 Gallons to produce one kilo of meat.

Growing food, to feed to something you intend to eat is an inefficient way to produce calories. So if solo action is your thing cutting down on meat will help reduce your carbon emissions, not to mention land and water usage.

From my point of view this is all largely irrelevant, because I want carbon taxed so that these stark differences are priced into the cost of the food. What is important is that by cutting out chicken and adding potato I made the curry better than one made with chicken alone. I’ve not saved the world one iota but I feel better for almost having done my bit. I’ve had a great meal into the bargain too.

The advice of this piece is simple, keep campaigning for Cap and Trade or a Carbon Tax or whatever compromise you think will work. Live the best you can and the next time you make a curry please cut down on the chicken and add some potato. You’ll feel good, you’ll feel full, you’ll feel like you’ve made a difference even if you haven’t.

But mostly you’ll have that curry on your mind for the rest of the evening and you won’t be able to blog about anything else. And I’ve left overs for work tomorrow!

Recipe available on request of course.

Advertisements

One thought on “Saving the Planet one meal at a time

  1. Well, if you’re not willing to give up meat/fish altogether, why not look for sustainable sources?

    I recommend two books- “The End Of The Line” by Charles Clover & “The Killing Of The Countryside” by Graham Harvey, about how industrial farming & fishing have sodded up the environment, & wouldn’t you just know it they both slag off the subsidy industry.

    I am a vegetarian, but I accept that eating meat doesn’t necessarily harm us, the planet or animals (well, apart from the fact that they’re killed, obviously, but they don’t suffer unduly).

    Have a look at this- according to Clover, if all other fish are exhausted we’ll all be resorting to eating this! Don’t know what it tastes like but I looked at Ocado & they are selling it, maybe some fishmongers & supermarkets too.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/content/articles/2009/02/24/south_east_tilapia_s15_w7_feature.shtml

    Also, pasture-fed beef that has eaten proper grass, not that ryegrass shite or whatever they serve them in pens. And organic eggs/chicken. I’ve always felt that the slight extra cost is worth it, especially because most people throw away half the food they eat anyway & if they thought their budgets through properly would generally be able to afford to eat well. I have a well below average income in a shite job but I neither go hungry nor eat shite. (Though admittedly I have no wife or kids & have a fairly low rent & tax bill).

    PS- As for sceptics, I’d have more respect if they just said “Yes, it’s happening, we give up our frenzied attempts to deny it, but we don’t actually give a flying fuck”. How about that, eh?

Comments are closed.