Left Outside

Regime change at the Bank of England?

Mark Carney was poached last week to replace Mervyn King as Governor of the Bank of England. As though replacing an incompetent central banker with a competent central banker wasn’t good enough, the news just kept on getting better:

From our perspective, thresholds exhaust the guidance options available to a central bank operating under flexible inflation targeting.

If yet further stimulus were required, the policy framework itself would likely have to be changed. For example, adopting a nominal GDP (NGDP)-level target could in many respects be more powerful than employing thresholds under flexible inflation targeting. This is because doing so would add “history dependence” to monetary policy. Under NGDP targeting, bygones are not bygones and the central bank is compelled to make up for past misses on the path of nominal GDP

I’m behind the curve a little bit on this one, but it is potentially huge news. Remember that under inflation targeting if you crash an economy but get inflation back up to a positive but low value then you’re more or less out of stimulus options. Hello lost decade. With a target for the level nominal GDP you must make up for any shortfall. Hello recovery summer.

Now, Mark Carney isn’t saying he wants to implement NGDP targeting, he isn’t even saying other people might want to implement it. He is merely saying that it is an option and central bankers need more options. The anti-Yes, Minister. “Something must be done. This is something. But there are other somethings too.” Eminently sensible and of course very central bankerese, as you would expect.

The Government is replete with figures who already find this option attractive. Giles Wilkes, much missed blogger, now my favourite coalition apparatchik (low praise indeed!), wrote the book on this from a UK perspective in 2010 in his paper “Credit Where It’s Due.” His Boss, Vince Cable is also sympathetic. Indeed, even George Osborne “said he was pleased Mr Carney was discussing such ideas.”

What makes this exciting is that implementing this policy revolution is really easy given the laws on the books in the UK.

One interesting thing about central bank independence in the UK, is that there are very few checks or balances protecting it. The Bank must aim for “price stability,” but the Chancellor can change the definition of “price stability” whenever he wants. It’s right there in the 1998 Bank Act. I thought I was the first UK blogger to cover this, but actually Britmouse got there a full two months before I picked it up. This isn’t an esoteric or obscure fact, if it’s in the FT it’s more or less in respectable discourse.

Politically, it would cement austerity as a fiscal and social policy measure, but would likely dramatically improve private sector job and productivity performance. As demand picked up underutilised resources and resources (stuff and people, basically) shed from the public sector would find it easier to find work. It is an electoral nightmare for Labour.

However, it would dramatically improve the economy’s performance, so even the anti-Tory in me agrees with Britmouse when he says “Tories Should Embrace Nominal GDP Level Targeting.” In 1931 the UK blazed a trail by abandoning the gold standard and ending the Great Depression, in 2013 maybe we will get a chance to end the Little Depression and one last moment as a great power.

________

In the main shamelessly cribbed from Britmouse, here are some links to things other people have written.

The BBC lower the tone by getting confused: “Mark Carney suggests targeting economic output

Sky News Editor Ed Conway: “Why we all need to know about NGDP

Jeremy Warner at the Daily Telegraph: “It’s time the Old Lady was given more obvious growth objectives

Larry Elliot at the Guardian: “New Bank of England governor Mark Carney mulls end of inflation targets

Gavyn Davies at the FT: “Carney differs from Bank of England orthodoxy

Chris Giles and George Parker at the FT: “Treasury open to Carney radicalism

FT Editorial: “New broom clears way for Old Lady

Chris Giles again: “Osborne should heed Carney’s message

Faisal Islam, Channel 4: “Carney’s recent musing on UK jobs and housing bubbles

…continued…

Dropping the Inflation Target? from Duncan Wheldon

Tories Should Embrace Nominal GDP Level Targeting from Britmouse

Monetary Policy Innovations from Simon Wren-Lewis

Mr. Osborne: “There is a lot of innovative stuff happening around the world” from Lars Christiensen

How soon is now, UK NGDP targeting edition from FT Alphaville

About these ads

Filed under: Economics, , , , ,

4 Responses - Comments are closed.

  1. Bill le Breton says:

    Have always admired your campaigning work on this issue, Left Outside. You may be interested in this post published on 1st February this year: http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-29-days-to-save-the-uk-26911.html – not the first in support of Market Monetarism on this site.

    The comments were not promising, I grant you, but Lib Dem support for NGDPLT and a call for the Quad to use its annual review of the Bank’s mandate to change the target has an good ancestry.

    With Japan at the polls and Carney turning a light onto Market Monetarism, this is a key MOMENT in history. It needs to happen in the UK, but it also needs to be a globally co-ordinated policy.

    Keep pressing, as Sir Bruce might say …

    • Left Outside says:

      Thanks for you kind words. I did once campaign for the Lib Dems, and it was Giles Wilkes who got me interested in Scott Sumners blog and NGDP targeting too.

      I think increasing the visibility of NGDP is really important, perhaps more important is trying to stop it become party political. Building a consensus behind the policy will be important if it is to be credible.

      I suspect Ed Balls knows about it, and is moderately supportive of it, but I reckon he also knows that NGDP targeting is a good way to get the Tories reelected, so I think it is important to try and get Labour on board with it.

      • Bill le Breton says:

        Agreed. Press whenever we can. Press wherever we have any influence at all.

        The more I think about this, the more I think that the central issue is between the pessimists and the optimists.

        The Central Bankers who are setting their NGDP sights very low are pessimistic about the capacity of their countries. The politicians who are allowing their Central Bankers to do so are revealing their own timidity.

        It is like someone freezing under pressure.

  2. […] Bank of England, as I’ve argued repeatedly, is responsible for our slow recovery. I was hopeful that the appointment of Mark might help accelerate the recovery, but I was wrong. The Big Idea, […]

When NGDP is Depressed, Employment is Depressed

RSS Subsciption

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,309 other followers

Increase NGDP, Put These People Back to Work

Follow me on twitter

December 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov   Jan »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archives

Politics Blogs

Testimonials

Paul Sagar

Left Outside is always worth a read for passionate, and frequently irreverent, analysis and comment.

Sunny Hundal

Oi! Enough of the cheek!

Chris Dillow

Left Outside is, I think, entirely wrong

John Band

This might be the least well informed piece I’ve read on LC, which is quite an accolade.

DEC Appeal

License

Creative Commons License
Left Outside by Left Outside is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.
Based on a work at leftoutside.wordpress.com.
Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://wp.me/PvyGQ-gt.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,309 other followers

%d bloggers like this: